Finding voice

In third grade, I started handing my teacher essays he hadn’t assigned.

They were about whatever had captured my imagination—dinosaurs, the ancient Egyptian mummification process… I wrote them at home, paraphrasing sections lifted from books I’d borrowed from the school library. I’d handwrite on loose-leaf papers, my letters large and swirling, and give them to my teacher, who took them with curiosity.

He always read them.

At the time, I didn’t have the language to explain why I did this.

Speaking up has never come easily to me. In conversation, words arrive slowly, often long after the moment has passed. Writing, however, gives me time. On the page I can sit with a thought, turn it over, understand what I mean before offering it to anyone else.

On paper, I don’t have to watch someone’s face twist in anger, annoyance, or dismissal. I don’t have to measure my emotions so they won’t be labeled “too much,” or worse, dismissed as the anger of an Arab woman. Writing removes the immediacy of other people’s reactions. It gives me space to think, and to say what I mean without fear interrupting the sentence—or without being interrupted.

For someone who grew up shy and wary of social rejection, writing became the safest place my voice could live.

I’ve only been a published author for less than two years, but I have been writing the last twenty-eight years, since I was a child. Stories have always been the way I figure out the world, lean into what I’m interested in, develop an understanding for another person (even if fictional). And, for someone who grew up shy, and afraid of social rejection, it was the best way I knew how to be heard, if only to myself.

It’s why, during an emotionally turbulent adolescence, ripe with loneliness and self-doubt, I wrote poems scribbled on loose-leaf paper, under moonlight peeking in through the bathroom window, even though I should have been in bed hours prior. The need to pour myself onto the page (never mind that no one would ever read it) outweighed the need for sleep.

Now, I write also because I have something to say to the world.

Often, I dismiss myself, and my own perspectives, thinking they are not important or salient enough to warrant sharing. I’ve been working on a narrative essay collection, of instances of discrimination and racism I’ve seen or experienced in my life, woven with history and science, and yet, several times in writing the manuscript, I considered abandoning.

Who would care about all this?
It sounds like you’re complaining.
Boo-hoo you were told something mean, get over it.
You’re preaching to the choir; whoever reads this book already knows everything you’re saying.
Your life isn’t horrible, stop making yourself a victim.

On and on, the thoughts swirl and confuse me, like a devil tempting me in the desert to give up on myself, an inner tribunal condemning me for being human. At its core it something more treacherous:

that I don’t have a voice.

This means so many things: that what I have to say isn’t important, that no one cares about the things I’m writing, that I’m wrong in my interpretation of my own life, that my life isn’t “bad” enough to warrant an entire book, that no one will take me seriously.

None of this is true, or rather, I would never believe this of another person. And yet I so readily apply these scripts to myself, narrating all the ways I have nothing of value to say.

Where all these feelings have come from is likely something I need years to unpack with a professional, but I do know that so often, girls, and especially, girls of brown or black identities, are told they must remain still, silent, and subservient. No one tells us these things directly, (well, usually), but we learn it implicitly. And we carry it with us into adulthood.

In the last two years of being published, I’ve seen a floodgate open in me, a willingness to stand in the face of all my insecurities and my thoughts of not having a voice, and remain steadfast, even if I falter.

Something about committing yourself on paper is at once freeing and redeeming, a permission granted unto the self to see yourself through the lens of value (and I don’t mean that in a capitalistic sense).

Writing frees the soul, gives voice to those who thought they had none. It is no wonder books are targeted, authors and creatives suppressed, when those in power want to remain in power. It is a way to exert existence, to demand to be seen and heard, to be deemed a person.

When I think about voice, I think about that child in third grade, sliding loose-leaf pages across a desk to a teacher who had not asked for them. I did not know then that what I was practicing was not simply writing, but presence. The small insistence of a person who needed to be heard, even if only by one reader.

Perhaps that is what writing has been for me: the quiet act of sending words out into the world and refusing to disappear.

By: Rania Hanna

If you want more content like this, be sure to follow my Substack.

Access is not Ownership

Something I’ve been thinking quite a lot about lately is the impermanence of things. I don’t mean that in an existential way, but in a tangible, physical domain manner.

Some years ago, I was surprised to learn that with an Audible (owned by Amazon) subscription, we do not own the audiobooks. Audible can, and has, removed titles at will, though once purchased, you should be able to access that title forever in the platform. But this leads me to several other questions, including, is something actually yours when it exists in “the cloud” in non-tangible format (at least, non-tangible in that it cannot be manipulated as an object by you) and could, theoretically, be removed at any point by someone other than you? Is it ownership, or is it permission to access that these platforms offer us?

And does it matter?

I’m sure this brings up many counterpoints and philosophical questions, but I’m more curious about what effect this has on our psychology, to feel so disconnected from the very things we interact with, and the very things which we purport to “own.” If a mega-conglomerate can control what I have access to, do I have, truly, access to those things? If the gate can be opened and closed without my control, do I control that gate?

I worry of the sense of impermanence this creates in our psyches, the idea that attachment is a risk, that nothing is real or stable. To me, this goes beyond the more philosophical “nothing lasts forever,” and more into the territory of a constantly shifting floor. I wonder if this will transfer not just to our perceptions of how media exists, but to our relationships, our sense of belonging and community, and the more important things in life. I wonder then: does this lead to more individualism and a further erosion of our communities and societies?

This, of course, leads to the natural concern of censorship. With book bans galore, too many to list out here, any opportunity for powers to remove or restrict access to books is a concern. When you do not physically retain something, it becomes that much easier to “disappear” it from your possession, doesn’t it?

This doesn’t just end with books.

In May 2023, before the October 7th attack on Israel, and before Israel’s current genocide of Palestinians, Mohammed Assaf, a Palestinian singer, claimed his popular song, Ana Dammi Falastini (My Blood is Palestinian), released in 2015, was removed from both Spotify and Apple. Assaf said he’d received “an official email about it, on the pretext that the song incites the Zionist enemy, …”

I know this song well, having listened to it for years, and not once does it mention, even implicitly, Zionism, never mind violence. The song is simply one that shows pride in, and honors, Palestinian heritage.

Spotify denied having removed the song, but claimed that “availability may vary over time and by country.” They further added that though they themselves did not remove the song, the song’s distributor did.

None of this makes sense to me given Assaf’s claim on receiving the email that specifically called out a Zionist-centered reason for the song’s removal. And while the song was unavailable on Spotify and Apple, it remained streaming on Arabic-music platform, Anghami.

The song was eventually relisted on Spotify following backlash, and after “a new license agreement was signed.” This apparently is not that new or unusual, though, with songs disappearing due to expired agreements, and reappearing once new ones are signed. But this still harkens back to my earlier point in this article: who owns the very things we consume? And what power can, and do, they wield over us because of this?

What’s interesting to me, besides the removal at will of media is the changing of media.

After watching the movie Sinners, I found the movie soundtrack on Spotify and quickly added my favorite songs to my “Liked” list.

But some weeks ago, when relistening to one of the songs, Pale, Pale, Moon, I was surprised to find the song sounded different from my memory of it. I listened again, and again, replaying the beginning segment in particular. Had the song been updated or changed since I’d last listened to it? It didn’t seem like a remix.

I quickly wondered if I was losing my mind.

A quick review of Spotify, and I realized that there were two versions of the song, one by singer Jayme Lawson, which was the one I knew first, and another by singer Brittany Howard, which was the one I’d heard that sounded different to me. I enjoy both, but one is more familiar to me.

This instance had a simple, and innocuous, explanation, but it did get me thinking: media can be so easily and subtly updated without our noticing and control, can’t it? What does this mean, then, for our sense of shared reality? Our sense of truth? How do we retain veracity when our entire realities can be force-changed like an operating system pushing out updates? When reality can be updated, how do we keep trusting our senses and each other?

Ownership does have a certain feel to me, more of a consumerist or capitalistic mentality, and may not be what we are all after. But for me, it’s not so much the ownership, as the continued and promised access, without change, to media, especially books, music, and art. What happens to a society if what it is exposed to can be changed without permission and without explanation?

With the change of US TikTok from Chinese ByteDance to US control, entire accounts have seen plummeting views and even banning. Emmy-winning Palestinian journalist surviving in Gaza Bisan Owda, with her 1.4 million followers, has been permanently banned from Tiktok after the change to US hands. According to an Al Jazeera article, “Hours after Owda shared her video, an account that appeared to have the same username was still visible on TikTok in Australia – but not in the Middle East, when Al Jazeera checked in different geographies.” When platforms control so much of our access to information, to thought, to clarity, what kind of reality is being created for us?

It concerns me, this thought, because it connects to power structures, to propaganda, censorship, suppression, and, ultimately, to loss of freedom. Intellectual identity and access is inherent to freedom, to education, and the reliable access to it is an integral foundation of a healthy society. When that access can be interrupted or outfitted with a new texture, we no longer have education; we have redirection, misdirection, and ultimately, de-education.

I am hardly the first to point all of this out, and I don’t have answers to most of the questions I’ve posed above, but I do wonder about them. I wonder what type of society is being, and has been, created when reality, especially art, can be so easily updated, turned on or off at will, and subject to outside powers.

By: Rania Hanna

Let me know what you think, whether you’ve had the same thoughts, or different ones, and whether this all bothers you as much as it does me.

It’s been a while: world on fire, creative work, and upcoming comic

Hi friends. It’s been a while.

Honestly, I haven’t had much energy lately to post much of anything, not the least of which a well-thought out blog post that’s worth sending out. Arguably, I don’t have the energy to write this one, but I’ll try to put down my thoughts regardless.

It’s been a horrible year. The world seems on fire, in some places, quite literally, including in Palestine/Israel, Syria, Turkey, California, Oregon, and other places. It seems the entire world is ablaze literally, and certainly, figuratively.

Palestine is under 22 months of siege, genocide, Israeli-engineered famine, and, as scholars are saying, a holocaust. Syria is under attack by Israel, including in Damascus and in southern Syria, where Druze populations are. Lebanon is precarious, with ongoing threats of attacks from Israel. Never mind our perilous situation in the United States, with Trump’s orders to send in the National Guard into DC, of which I saw groups of 3 or 5 roaming the National Mall and metro stations just two weekends ago.

It’s a scary time, and that’s not even going into the assaults on women, queer, Indigenous, Black, and other lives in America alone.

(BTW, there’s a bookish auction ongoing to raise funds for immigrant and trans rights, through August 27th).

With everything going on, I’ve continued to write, but I feel a bit…dead…inside, like I’m mostly a shell of a person right now. Creatively, I’m still doing work, but I can feel both body and mind slowing down, grieving, and, frankly, retracting, even as I try to reach out to people more. It’s a fine line between staying informed, trying to do work that can contribute to a healthy society, and protecting myself from the constant onslaught of horrible events. No wonder my recent Youtube watches have been on nomading through the US in a car, finding a couple acres to build a homestead on, and relaxing book recommendations coupled with homemade pastries and teas.

I have a few projects I’ve been working on, including a few novels, and one semi-memoir/social commentary on Arab-American discrimination and racism. They’re in different stages of creation, some I’m in the throes of edits for, others I’m still doing research for.

However, a short spread in a comic issue is coming out, a story on imperialism’s actions on collective memory and the rewriting of history. The story comes out in Planet Comics: Book Six, which you can back on Kickstarter. The work has hit full funding, but if you’d like a copy, feel free to back the project. It should come out in November-ish of this year.

Here’s a bit on my piece:

Rania Hanna (author of The Jinn Daughter), Erin Dodge and Ari Pluchinsky bring us the single-issue story, “The Archivist of Al-Azrakh”!

Sample page from “The Archivist of Al-Azrakh”

Signing off for now, and maybe for a while,
Rania

The Jinn Daughter has been receiving attention!

The Jinn Daughter has been positively received by critics and readers alike the last few weeks since its release, in paperback, hardcover, and ebook formats.

Here’s what reviewers have been saying:

  • Elle Magazine: Best Fantasy of 2024, so far
  • BookRiot: 10 exciting books to read this summer
  • DC Trending: Best new books of summer 2024
  • Literary Liberation podcast: Read this if you need a mother’s love
  • Arab News: A hauntingly inimitable debut
  • The New Arab: “The fairytale-like and bizarre scenes elevate the story’s mystique and are reminiscent of a mature and Middle Eastern Grim[m] Brothers tale”
  • Starry mag: “Just know that tissues will be needed”